logo

Clinical Trials for AI Models

Find deployment disasters before they happen.

Stress-test models under real ICU conditions: missing labs, population shifts, workflow chaos.

Sepsis Prediction Models - Validation Run

Logistic Regression

Score: 85/100
Ready for Production

XGBoost Classifier

Score: 78/100
Stability64/100
Generalizability62/100
DO NOT DEPLOY
Automated validation in 4m 32s
THE PROBLEM

70% of healthcare AI models never reach production

Hospital AI passes offline validation with clean test sets, then breaks on real patients. Models don't see missing data, workflow chaos, or population shifts until it's too late—and too expensive to fix.

title

The Missing Data Problem

Clean test sets hide the reality: production EHRs lose 30%+ labs, hit delayed vitals, and have patchy notes. Models trained on pristine data stumble on live patients.

title

The Workflow Chaos Problem

Offline validation ignores EHR upgrades, documentation slip-ups, sensor drift, and midnight staffing. Hospitals are chaotic, constantly changing, and anything but static CSVs.

title

The Population Shift Problem

ICU populations and physiology drift weekly, so last year’s validation cohort doesn’t mirror today’s patients. Silent failures emerge as unseen subpopulations and new disease patterns hit production.

THE LANDSCAPE

Where Krv Fits in Clinical AI Validation

Current evaluation approaches are complex and time-consuming. We streamline the R2P lifecycle with targeted testing that finds failure modes before production.

Where Krv Slots Into the R2P Lifecycle
HOW IT WORKS

Stress-Test Models Before They Touch Patients

We run your model through thousands of realistic clinical scenarios—missing data, workflow chaos, edge cases—to find failure modes before production deployment.

01
02
Patient A (Na: 139)Risk: 0.45
Patient B (Na: 140)Risk: 0.46
03
HR: 72
HR: 600
K: 4.2
K: 15
04

01

Generalizability

We stress-test your model on age groups, ethnicities, and comorbidity combinations it's never seen. If it fails on a 25-year-old after training on seniors, you'll know before deployment.

02

Stability

Does a 1-point sodium shift (139→140) flip the diagnosis? We test clinically identical patients—like monozygotic twins—to ensure consistent risk scores and catch numerical instability.

03

Sanity

We inject impossible data (Heart Rate 600, Potassium 15, male pregnancy) and logic errors to verify your model catches nonsense instead of amplifying it.

04

Resilience

Can your model handle 30% missing labs or 2-hour vital delays? We simulate EHR outages, sensor drift, and staffing constraints to ensure graceful degradation.

WHY WE WIN

Krv Platform vs. Shadow Mode

Shadow mode finds problems after 12 months on live patients. We find them in weeks—before deployment.

title

5 Weeks, Not 12 Months

Shadow mode runs live models for a year. We simulate thousands of messy clinical scenarios in weeks so you catch edge cases, missing data, and drift before deployment.

title

Exact Failure Modes, Not AUROC Scores

Shadow mode goes beyond aggregate scores. It pinpoints failures—'30% missing labs cuts sensitivity 40%' or 'Asian, 65+ drift'—so you fix them before going live.

title

Prevent Bad Deployments

Epic’s sepsis model succeeded on paper (76-83%) but caught 33% in practice. Shadow mode would have caught that before a single patient was exposed.

Dotted
ASK YOURSELF

Would You Deploy an Untested Model?

Not even close. Your test set has 0% missing data. Production EHRs have 30%+ missing labs. Your test set is balanced across demographics. Production ICU patients cluster in ways you didn't train for. Your test set is static. Production involves EHR upgrades, sensor drift, and documentation errors. AUROC tells you aggregate performance on clean data. We tell you exactly when your model breaks: '30% missing labs drops sensitivity to 60%' or 'Asian patients age 65+ trigger miscalibration.' You need both. We provide the second.